by Benjamin Merhav
As mentioned earlier in this series (see article 40, the first post on this blog), Noam Chomsky has been supporting the official cover-up for the assassination of J.F. Kennedy. It has got to do,possibly, with the zionist loyalty of Noam Chomsky, because the most likely conspirators-murderers of Kennedy were the chiefs of the zionist Gestapo.
As the rulers of the zionist apartheid regime of Israel were just beginning their secret nuclear bombs production at the Dimona pile in the early 60's, President Kennedy had then voiced his opposition to this new zionist adventure-crime. The other co-conspirators,namely, the CIA and the USA mafia hated the Kennedy brothers too, but did not have the vengeful urgency that the zionist Gestapo chiefs had.
Nothing and no one represented that crime more than Jack Ruby who murdered Lee Oswald so as to prevent the truth from emerging. Jack Ruby was a mafia man with connections to both the CIA and to the zionist Gestapo. He himself died shortly after, presumably, because he "knew too much" and was therefore too big a risk for the zionist Gestapo.
In article 40 I quote two articles which condemn Chomsky's support for the cover-up :
http://www.geocities.com/mdmorrissey/rechom1.htm
Rethinking Chomsky ,by M.D. Morrissey.
The other one is :
http://www.rtis.com/reg/bcs/pol/touchstone/february97/worsham.htm
JFK CONSPIRACY: THE INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY AND COWARDICE OF ALEXANDER COCKBURN AND NOAM CHOMSKY
by Michael Worsham.
Today, a third article was emailed to me by
"Sadanand, Nanjundiah (Physics Earth Sciences)" . Although Noam Chomsky
www.news.independent.co.uk
Doubt cast on JFK 'lone assassin' theory
by Andrew Buncombe in Washington
18 May 2007,
More than 40 years after he was fatally shot in
Dallas, researchers have added fresh fuel to the
speculation over who was involved in the assassination
of President John F Kennedy by claiming the original
bullet analysis was flawed and cannot rule out that a
second gunman was involved.
Using new scientific techniques not available to
previous researchers and analysing bullets from the
same batch purportedly used by Lee Harvey Oswald, the
team has argued that it cannot be assumed that Oswald
was the only assassin involved. While they do not
claim evidence to prove a second gunman participated,
they say the original fragments of the bullets
recovered from the scene of the shooting should be
re-examined.
"Given the significance and impact of the JFK
assassination, it is scientifically desirable for the
evidentiary fragments to be reanalysed," the
researchers write in the journal Annals of Applied
Statistics.
Kennedy, the 35th US president, was fatally shot as
his motorcade passed through Dealey Plaza in Dallas on
22 November 1963. The official Warren commission that
investigated the killing concluded the following year
that the president had been killed by two of three
shots fired by Oswald - his first shot having missed -
from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book
Depository.
The second shot - the so-called magic bullet - struck
Kennedy in the back and exited through his neck before
striking the Texas Governor John Connally, who was
travelling in the same limousine. The third shot hit
Kennedy in the head and killed him.
Despite the official conclusion that Oswald acted
alone, there has been endless speculation other gunmen
participated in the killing and that the authorities
sought to cover up their participation. Grainy
photographs and footage from a home movie, the
Zapruder film, are examined for other possible
assassins standing on the grassy knoll or else behind
the white picket fence - locations surrounding Dealey
Plaza that have entered conspiratorial lore.
The team arguing that five fragments of bullet
recovered from Dealey Plaza be re-examined include
William Tobin, the FBI's former chief metallurgy
analyst, who examined evidence from cases such as the
1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the 1996 bombing of TWA
Flight 800.
The Washington Post reported yesterday that after he
retired, Mr Tobin drew national attention by
questioning the FBI's methods of matching bullets to
suspects based on their lead content. As a result of
his questions, the bureau switched its methods.
The original analysis, based on lead content,
concluded the five fragments came from just two
bullets, traced to the same batch that Oswald bought.
Mr Tobin and his colleagues purchased bullets from the
same batch owned by Oswald - available on the internet
as collectors' items - and used new techniques to
analyse them. They found the science and statistical
assumptions used by the original examination to
conclude the fragments were from just two bullets was
wrong.
"This finding means that the bullet fragments from the
assassination that match could have come from three or
more separate bullets," the researchers write. "If the
assassination fragments are derived from three or more
separate bullets than a second assassin is likely."
Conspiracists have received support from many areas,
not least Oswald's background as a visitor to the
Soviet Union and his interest in Cuba. The fact that
he himself was shot just days after the assassination
by a man with low-level links to the Mafia - and who
himself died soon afterwards from cancer - have only
added to speculation.
A 1979 report by the House Select Committee on
Assassinations concluded it was likely Oswald acted as
part of a conspiracy and that a second gunman is
likely to have fired at Kennedy but missed.
But for each point raised by the conspiracists, others
have been able to offer a rebuttal. Just last month,
former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi published an
exhaustive 2,792-page book, Reclaiming History, that
also concludes Oswald acted alone and seeks to knock
down most, if not all, the surviving conspiracies.
Despite this, polls show that a majority of Americans
still believe there was more to Kennedy's
assassination and the official version is not
complete. Gerald Posner, author of Case Closed,
another convincing study that concludes Oswald acted
alone, hits upon one reason why people cannot accept
that Oswald, armed with a $12 rifle, could be
responsible for such an epic event.
In the book he quotes the historian William
Manchester: "Those who desperately want to believe
that President Kennedy was the victim of a conspiracy
have my sympathy. If you put the murdered President of
the United States on one side of the scale and that
wretched waif Oswald on the other side, it does not
balance. You want to add something weightier to
Oswald."
The conspiracy theories :
* Kennedy was killed by Cuban agents in retaliation
for the Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961.
* Four gunmen killed Kennedy but Oswald was not among
them and knew nothing of the plot - a theory expounded
by Ron Rice, a member of staff at Dallas's Conspiracy
Museum.
* Vice-President Lyndon Johnson, who then became
President, arranged the assassination - a theory
outlined in a book by Barr McClellan, father of
President Bush's former spokesman Scott McClellan.
* A second gunman was involved in the killing, a
theory given even more oxygen by Oliver Stone's 1991
movie JFK which shows a puff of gunsmoke on the
plaza's grassy knoll. Norman Mailer has also posited
this theory.
* Kennedy's killing was organised by the Mafia because
of the increasing pressure put on them by his brother,
the attorney general, Robert Kennedy.
* Israel organised the killing to retaliate against
Kennedy's opposition to its nuclear weapons ambitions.
(Emphasis added - B.M.)
